The 2008 version of the Humanitarian Response Index was launched by the Development Assistance Research Associates (DARA) NPO (See the complete note here). For those of you that did not know the index, the web page is here. You can check there the results of last and this year, where the performance of 22 countries plus the European Commission is compared, as well as check other activities of DARA. However, the whole report is not available on-line.
The approach used to evaluate response performance combines quantitative data and qualitative perception by humanitarian organization on the ground. The pillars of the index are:
(1) Responding to the needs
(2) supporting local capacity and recovery
(3) Working with humanitarian partners
(4) Promoting Standards and Enhancing implementation
(5) Promoting learning and accountability
Relevant for our particular interest, Japan remains not well regarded, in a low 18th position. Criticism points to recognized structural weaknesses on refugees and local NGOs. Besides, predominance of earmarked funding, and low support to forgotten emergencies are also highlighted. Positive scores relate to "affirming primary role of civilian organization" and allocation of aid in accordance to international indexes. A little bit confusing, do not you think? Well, expect further info.
OAGS